Brought to you this week by SPACE i love space.
with a still, restrained, almost annoyed sigh, what voice in what wilderness, minutest cricket, most unworthy flower I will never be tired — I will never be noisy I will be your best little girl — nobody else will see me, but you — but that is enough — limitlessness, wilt thou say,ah, ladies, good night, good night, good night ladies —and who therefore know the biology of the soft matter and the cluster of creation in its salty stellar lonely archive is matched by the sweet violence of thought,who transubstantiated across the desert with both of them finally under the deep clear her blonde beauty and the celestial betrayals arrayed stellar, Andromeda chained naked to a rock, the Pleiades shedding to doves to stars,
The reinterpretation of Ginsberg’s “Howl” that I absolutely wanted forever and ever.
As long as scholars think of consciousness as a magic essence floating inside the brain, it won’t be very interesting to engineers. But if it’s a crucial set of information, a kind of map that allows the brain to function correctly, then engineers may want to know about it. And that brings us back to artificial intelligence. Gone are the days of waiting for computers to get so complicated that they spontaneously become conscious. And gone are the days of dismissing consciousness as an airy-fairy essence that would bring no obvious practical benefit to a computer anyway. Suddenly it becomes an incredibly useful tool for the machine.
I sent this to my brother. Him: “Ok but has someone invented the app that will care about this for me?” THANKS BRO.
Really, though, I fell into this headfirst, start to finish, because that concept of the singularity always bothered me- that there was no solution to making machines and software self-aware, just that if we made them fast enough, it would happen, and that sounds too much like irrationality and magic. The piece from Aeon argues that creating an artificial consciousness means treating consciousness not as a spark lit only within humans, but as a property of our supercomputing brains’ processors that allows us to filter and focus in a way that we’re just barely getting computers to do.
Next pointless research excursion: how did people describe the human brain before computers?
Remember analogue photography? What a nightmare.
Speaking of technology, because it’s that kind of week: PLUTO.
Emily Lakadawalla has written and tweeted about everything going on with Pluto and New Horizons this week. I’ve read so much of her work this week that when I finally saw her at the NASA press conference livestream SPEAK WITH HER HUMAN VOICE AND ASK A QUESTION I got weirdly emotional like meeting an internet friend for the first time. Anyway. Highlights:
- New Horizons got to Pluto!
- New Horizons survived its encounter with Pluto and was not destroyed by Kuiper Belt Objects!
- New Horizons is actively returning information back to us while it’s not science-ing!
- NASA’s gif showing our evolving view of Pluto through the years.
- The Bad Astronomy @ Slate look at today (Wednesday)’s Pluto/Charon pics, and a tiny pixelated one of Hydra! So tiny! So pixelated!
- NASA’s official New Horizons images page.
- Raw(ish) images from the probe’s LORRI camera.
- Stephen Colbert yelled at Neil deGrasse Tyson about Pluto for 15 minutes, and they ate Klondikes together for a good five or six of those minutes. Everything is beautiful.
Next press conference with the first lossless images will be 1PM EST Friday! SCREAMING.